Skip to content

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge — Hon. John L. Blanchard retention

Unofficial result: Won — John L. Blanchard (Nonpartisan)

Source: elections.maricopa.gov

What does this office do?

  • Deciding trials in the county
  • Ruling on evidence and setting sentences in criminal cases
  • Deciding family, probate, and civil disputes

Affects: Public Safety and Crime Control, Criminal Justice and Civil Liberties, Housing Affordability,

John L. Blanchard

Nonpartisan · Incumbent · Official site

John L. Blanchard is a Maricopa County Superior Court judge who has served since 2019.

Where John L. Blanchard stands, based on their records

Supports

Civil Rights (1 record)

Track record

Track record — Civil Rights

Civil Rights · 1 support
  • Rejected a constitutional challenge to Proposition 209 medical-debt collection protections; the Court of Appeals affirmed.

    April 30, 2024Supports Civil Rights

    Source: azcourts.gov

Track record — General

General · 5 records

Track record — Legal Competence

Legal Competence · 14 favorable
  • Was found to meet Arizona judicial performance standards for the 2026 retention cycle.

    April 24, 2026Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov

  • Entered summary judgment and a fee award in a municipal risk-pool dispute; the Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part.

    January 7, 2026Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: coa1.azcourts.gov

  • Oversaw a fraud trial and punitive-damages award that the Court of Appeals affirmed.

    July 24, 2025Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: coa1.azcourts.gov

  • Entered judgment in a civil dispute that the Court of Appeals affirmed.

    March 20, 2025Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: azcourts.gov

  • Dismissed a legal-malpractice action for failure to supply an expert affidavit; the Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part.

    January 7, 2025Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: azcourts.gov

  • Rejected a constitutional challenge to Proposition 209 medical-debt collection protections; the Court of Appeals affirmed.

    April 30, 2024Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: azcourts.gov

  • Referred a litigant for a vexatious-litigant determination after finding repeated unsupported and abusive filings; the presiding judge imposed filing restrictions.

    November 17, 2023Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: azcourts.gov

  • Ordered disclosure of independent-medical-examination reports concerning other people; the Court of Appeals granted relief and vacated the requirement.

    April 27, 2023Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: law.justia.com

  • Was found to meet 2022 Arizona judicial performance standards with 100% of participating commissioners voting yes.

    November 8, 2022Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov

  • Issued post-decree orders on community debts and attorney fees; the Court of Appeals affirmed in part and remanded in part.

    June 21, 2022Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: azcourts.gov

  • Became a member and shareholder at Osborn Maledon.

    January 1, 2005Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov

  • Began practicing as an associate at Osborn Maledon.

    January 1, 2001Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov

  • Began practicing as an associate at Brown and Bain.

    January 1, 1999Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov

  • Clerked for Judge William C. Canby Jr. on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

    January 1, 1998Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov

Track record — Candidate Ethics

Candidate Ethics · 4 records
  • Was found to meet Arizona judicial performance standards for the 2026 retention cycle.

    April 24, 2026

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov

  • Kept David Cook on the legislative primary ballot after finding enough valid signatures and insufficient proof of forgery; the Arizona Supreme Court affirmed.

    May 9, 2024

    Source: law.justia.com

  • Referred a litigant for a vexatious-litigant determination after finding repeated unsupported and abusive filings; the presiding judge imposed filing restrictions.

    November 17, 2023

    Source: azcourts.gov

  • Was found to meet 2022 Arizona judicial performance standards with 100% of participating commissioners voting yes.

    November 8, 2022

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov

Source: jpr.azcourts.gov