Skip to content

Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two Judge — Hon. Christopher J. O'Neil retention

Unofficial result: Won — Christopher J. O'Neil (Nonpartisan)

Source: app.enhancedvoting.com

Pinal County, Arizona
Retention race

What does this office do?

  • Deciding trials in the county
  • Ruling on evidence and setting sentences in criminal cases
  • Deciding family, probate, and civil disputes

Affects: Public Safety and Crime Control, Criminal Justice and Civil Liberties, Housing Affordability,

Christopher J. O'Neil

Nonpartisan · Incumbent · Official site

Christopher J. O'Neil is a judge on the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two. O'Neil previously served as a Pinal County Superior Court judge and as presiding judge of the Casa Grande City Court.

Track record

Track record — General

General · 7 records
  • Freedom Club PAC endorsed retaining him in the 2026 Court of Appeals election.

    September 27, 2026

    Source: azballot.org

  • Wrote an opinion allowing discovery of attendees’ names from a Pima County executive session while rejecting part of a records claim.

    June 16, 2026

    Source: appeals2.az.gov

  • Wrote an opinion vacating a parental-rights termination after finding the cited statute did not apply to a previously dismissed paternity action.

    January 8, 2026

    Source: appeals2.az.gov

  • Wrote an opinion returning a child-support case for further review of its income and support calculations.

    October 1, 2024

    Source: appeals2.az.gov

  • Wrote an opinion allowing part of a wrongful-death suit over a Pima County constable shooting to proceed.

    February 14, 2024

    Source: appeals2.az.gov

  • Wrote an opinion upholding a driver-license suspension based on accumulated traffic violations.

    July 25, 2023

    Source: appeals2.az.gov

  • Denied a continuance in a Pinal drug trial while offering accommodations for the defendant’s pain. The appeals court affirmed.

    December 17, 2019

    Source: law.justia.com

Track record — Impartiality

Impartiality · 1 favorable
  • Arizona’s judicial review commission found he met performance standards. Recent surveys rated legal ability 94% and impartiality 100% acceptable or above.

    September 27, 2026Favorable on Impartiality

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov

Track record — Legal Competence

Legal Competence · 1 favorable
  • Arizona’s judicial review commission found he met performance standards. Recent surveys rated legal ability 94% and impartiality 100% acceptable or above.

    September 27, 2026Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov

Sources: apps.azsos.gov · jpr.azcourts.gov