Skip to content

Constitutional Amendment I: Conditioning the Requirement of Expanded Medicaid on the Level of Federal Medical Assistance

Unofficial result: Failed

Source: electionresults.sd.gov

South Dakota
My vote power: Above average

What does this measure do?

Opposes: Healthcare Affordability, Social Programs and Welfare

South Dakota would keep its expanded Medicaid coverage only as long as the federal government pays at least 90% of the cost. If the federal share ever dropped below 90%, the state could end or cut coverage for the adults who gained it under expansion.

Read the official ballot measure (PDF)

Proposed by: South Dakota Legislature (House Joint Resolution 5001, Sen. Casey Crabtree and Rep. Will Mortenson)

Both are Republicans, joined by 34 Republican co-sponsors. State lawmakers voted to put this constitutional change on the ballot.

Source: sdlegislature.gov

A YES vote means

A yes vote lets the state end or cut expanded Medicaid coverage if the federal government's share of the cost falls below 90 percent.

A NO vote means

A no vote keeps the constitutional requirement to provide expanded Medicaid no matter how much the federal government pays.

No financial records found for this ballot measure.

Sources: sdlegislature.gov · sdsos.gov

Sources: sdsos.gov2