Lisa Fink
Republican · AZ · Arizona State Representative, District 27
Lisa Fink serves in the Arizona House and is a parental rights activist. She earned a bachelor's degree from Brigham Young University and has worked as a healthcare professional.
Where Lisa Fink stands, based on their records
Supports
AI Regulation (1 record), Healthcare Affordability (1 record), Anti-Corruption (3 records),
Opposes
Labor Rights (1 record), Immigration (4 records), Social Programs and Welfare (6 records),
Mixed record
Environment and Public Health (1 support · 10 oppose), Public Safety and Crime Control (9 support · 3 oppose), Election Integrity (10 support · 1 oppose),
Campaign finance information not available
Track record
Track record — AI Regulation
AI Regulation · 1 support
Voted for Senate Bill 1462, which extends Arizona's law on sharing explicit images to fakes made by computer. The crime now covers an image that looks like a real, named person but was made or changed with software, artificial intelligence or editing tools. For such an image it no longer matters whether the person could expect privacy. Images made for science, teaching or news are left out. The Arizona House passed it 33-24, and the Governor signed it into law.
April 17, 2025Supports AI Regulation
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Healthcare Affordability
Healthcare Affordability · 1 support
Lisa Fink introduced two bills to add lactation care to Arizona Medicaid coverage and create state certification for lactation providers; both passed the House Health and Human Services Committee unanimously.
January 29, 2026Supports Healthcare Affordability
Source: axios.com · researched July 12, 2026
Track record — Environment and Public Health
Environment and Public Health · 1 support · 10 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1300, which would have let Cochise County put groundwater limits for part of the San Simon valley to its voters. The area would have become an irrigation non-expansion area, which caps new irrigated acreage. Anyone drawing from a non-exempt well would have had to meter it and report the amount each year. The Arizona House passed it 31-23, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 6, 2025Supports Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1518, which would have made old groundwater pumping rights tradable. Inside the newer management areas, the holder of a grandfathered irrigation right could have sold, leased, used or transferred the right and the water that goes with it. A holder who had left some of the land unirrigated could have sold or leased that share too. The Arizona House passed it 32-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 5, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Lisa Fink sponsored HB2058 to require Arizona public colleges to inform adult students about vaccine-requirement exemptions; Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed it.
April 15, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: azleg.gov · researched July 12, 2026
Lisa Fink sponsored HB2063 to require schools to notify parents about child-immunization exemptions; Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed it.
April 15, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: azleg.gov · researched July 12, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2574, which would have let counties approve small subdivisions without a water supply test. A county could have allowed splits of six to ten parcels where each is at least two acres. Those splits would not have been subject to the assured or adequate water supply rules that larger subdivisions must meet. The Arizona House passed it 31-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
March 11, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2573, which would have moved wine grapes and crops grown without soil outside Arizona's irrigation limits. Water used on them would have counted as non-irrigation use in a groundwater management area. Growers could also have watered them using an old farm pumping right in the first management areas. The Arizona House passed it 33-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 26, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2527, which would have made it harder to close a power plant. The Corporation Commission could not have approved retiring a generating plant unless a new plant of equal or greater output was already available. The commission would have had to favor sources that can be switched on to order, and to plan for at least 5 percent more of that kind of power between 2025 and 2030. The Arizona House passed it 33-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 26, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2291, which ends the rule that a pharmacist must put a red cap on a bottle of prescription opioids. Lawmakers added the red cap in 2018 so that strong painkillers would stand out in a medicine cabinet. The warning label about the risk of addiction stays in place, and the state pharmacy board loses the power it had to excuse a pharmacy from the red cap rule. The Arizona House passed it 36-22, and the Governor signed it into law.
February 20, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2202, which would have let farmers move an old pumping right onto new ground. A grandfathered irrigation right lets land keep drawing groundwater because it was farmed before the area came under limits. Inside the newer management areas, the holder could have irrigated land never irrigated before, if it sits next to a farm unit that was, and if the total water drawn did not rise. The Arizona House passed it 32-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 12, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2089, which would have let voters end a groundwater management area. These areas are the zones where Arizona limits how much groundwater may be pumped. Ten percent of registered voters inside one of the newer areas could have petitioned to remove the designation, ten years after it was made. The water director would then have examined the basin before the question went to a vote. The Arizona House passed it 32-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 12, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2088, which would have let the state water director shrink a groundwater management area. These areas are the zones where Arizona limits how much groundwater may be pumped. The director could have removed land from one of the newer areas on deciding it no longer met the test for being included. The Arizona House passed it 32-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 11, 2025Opposes Environment and Public Health
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Labor Rights
Labor Rights · 1 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1514, which would have made arbitration binding for some warehouse workers. A written agreement to arbitrate an employment dispute would have been valid and could not have been revoked, for workers whose main job is loading, unloading or handling goods at a warehouse. Their right to complain to the civil rights division would have remained. The Arizona House passed it 34-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
June 18, 2025Opposes Labor Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Anti-Corruption
Anti-Corruption · 3 support
Voted for Senate Bill 1036, which would have let residents enforce the ban on public money being used to sway an election. That ban already applies to the state, local government, school districts and special taxing districts. Only the Attorney General and county attorneys can bring a case now. Any resident could have brought one in superior court. The Arizona House passed it 31-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Supports Anti-Corruption
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1089, which would have made the transport department explain passing over the cheapest bid. Every three months the director would have had to report to the leaders of both chambers. The report would have had to list each construction contract where the lowest responsible bidder was not chosen, and say why. The Arizona House passed it 33-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 16, 2025Supports Anti-Corruption
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1612, which would have opened up state health contracting. The state health program would have lost its exemption from Arizona's procurement rules. A company bidding for work would have had to disclose anything of value it, its officers or their family members had given over the past five years to the Governor, or to bodies the Governor controls such as a campaign committee. The Arizona House passed it 31-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 16, 2025Supports Anti-Corruption
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Immigration
Immigration · 4 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1268, which would have made hospitals ask patients about their immigration status. Any hospital taking payment from the state health program would have had to put a space on its admission form for the patient, or their representative, to say whether they are a United States citizen, lawfully present, or not lawfully present. The health department would have reported the answers every three months. The Arizona House passed it 32-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 5, 2025Opposes Immigration
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1088, which would have tied Arizona government to federal immigration enforcement. The duty would have covered the state, its agencies, cities, counties and firms working under contract for them. Each would have had to follow federal immigration and deportation law. Each would also have had to work with the three federal agencies that carry it out. The Arizona House passed it 31-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Opposes Immigration
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1610, which would have required county jails to feed information to federal immigration agents. For people arrested on listed offenses, a jail would have had to send the name, address, date of birth, sex and social security number daily or on request. It would also have had to hand over a photograph and description, and allow an interview. The Arizona House passed it 33-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 16, 2025Opposes Immigration
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1164, which would have pushed local officials toward federal immigration enforcement. State and local officials could have worked with federal immigration agents. Jails would have had to act on immigration detainers. A detainer is a request to hold someone so federal agents can come for them. The Attorney General could have investigated and enforced compliance. The Arizona House passed it 33-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 10, 2025Opposes Immigration
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Public Safety and Crime Control
Public Safety and Crime Control · 9 support · 3 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1019, which would have banned photo enforcement of traffic laws. No state agency or local authority could have used a camera system to identify someone breaking a traffic or speeding law. The bill repealed the existing sections that allow the practice. The Arizona House passed it 34-22, and the Governor vetoed it.
June 24, 2025Opposes Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1310, which would have raised the penalty for filing a fake claim against someone's property. Knowingly filing a false document that claims an interest in, or a lien on, land or a building would have become a class 4 felony. It is a class 1 misdemeanor now. The Arizona House passed it 34-23, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 5, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1295, which makes a convincing fake of a real person a crime. It is now criminal impersonation to use a computer-made voice, image or video of someone else to cheat people. Doing so is a class 5 felony. Comedy, parody, art and criticism are not covered, and neither is anything a reasonable person can see has been altered. The Arizona House passed it 40-17, and the Governor signed it into law.
May 5, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1725, which would have cut the amount of fentanyl needed to trigger the toughest sentences. Arizona sets longer fixed prison terms where a sale involves a large quantity. The threshold would have dropped from 200 grams to 9 grams. The Arizona House passed it 31-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1462, which extends Arizona's law on sharing explicit images to fakes made by computer. The crime now covers an image that looks like a real, named person but was made or changed with software, artificial intelligence or editing tools. For such an image it no longer matters whether the person could expect privacy. Images made for science, teaching or news are left out. The Arizona House passed it 33-24, and the Governor signed it into law.
April 17, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1461, which protects a police officer who is promoted and then fails the probation that goes with the higher rank. The employer may no longer dismiss that officer and may only demote them. The employer can still dismiss any officer for just cause at any time. The protection does not cover a recruit promoted out of the police academy, or an officer who transfers in from another force and fails an initial probation. The Arizona House passed it 42-17, and the Governor signed it into law.
April 10, 2025Opposes Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1060, which changes how a police force questions one of its own officers. An officer facing an internal inquiry must get the papers first. The employer has to hand over any relevant material it has on hand at least 24 hours before the interview. Three things excuse that. The officer can waive it. The employer can decide an earlier interview will keep the officer's account clean. Or the evidence can mean the interview must happen within a day of a major incident. The Arizona House passed it 38-20, and the Governor signed it into law.
March 25, 2025Opposes Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1437, which widens who must report suspected abuse of a child at school. School board members, charter school board members and substitute teachers now carry the same duty to report as other school staff. A school resource officer or school safety officer who receives such a report must pass it straight to the police force covering the area, with everything they have. A student thought to be a victim may be interviewed only under the county's agreed protocol. The Arizona House passed it 38-20, and the Governor signed it into law.
March 18, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2607, which sets fixed prison terms for carrying a large amount of fentanyl in a vehicle. The terms apply to someone convicted of having or moving at least 200 grams of fentanyl for sale in a motor vehicle. That person faces 5 years at the low end, 10 years as the standard term, and 15 years at the top. A second such conviction raises those terms to 10, 15, and 20 years. A judge may still move the standard term up or down for reasons already set out in state law. The Arizona House passed it 46-12, and the Governor signed it into law.
March 3, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2374, which targets foreign governments that go after people living in Arizona. Stalking, threats, harassment and assault each move up one offense class when an agent of a foreign government or a foreign terrorist group does them. The law also bars foreign police from working in Arizona without permission. The state police must build a training course so officers can spot this kind of pressure and act on it. The Arizona House passed it 35-25, and the Governor signed it into law.
February 26, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2114, which raises the penalty for an adult who has sex with a teenager aged 15 to 17. That offense becomes a class 4 felony instead of a class 6 felony when the adult is older than 21 and more than five years older than the teenager. Anyone convicted who is put on probation rather than sent to prison must serve one year in jail. The Arizona House passed it 39-20, and the Governor signed it into law.
February 12, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2074, which widens what the state School Safety Program pays for. Schools may now use the money for school safety officers and for safety equipment, training and building work, not just for resource officers and counselors. A school that takes the money must have an emergency response plan and a yearly safety check, and must share its floor plans with local police, fire and ambulance services. Officers placed under the program must be trained in student privacy law, civil rights and teenage mental health. School floor plans are also closed to public records requests. The Arizona House passed it 35-24, and the Governor signed it into law.
February 3, 2025Supports Public Safety and Crime Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Housing Affordability
Housing Affordability · 3 support
Voted for Senate Bill 1529, which makes cities keep a set of ready-made house plans that any builder can use. A city must offer at least three designs, each with at least three outside looks. Plans for single-family homes and small second homes start in July 2026, and plans for duplexes and triplexes start in January 2027. Cities must post the approved plans and the plan owner's contact details on their website. Building from a plan that is already approved is meant to cut the time and cost of getting a permit. The Arizona House passed it 44-12, and the Governor signed it into law.
June 26, 2025Supports Housing Affordability
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1353, which speeds up city review of home building permits. In a city of 30,000 or more people, once the city has approved a home's construction documents and allowed building to start on the lot or subdivision, it has 15 working days to answer the permit request for a single-family home. If it does not answer, an outside reviewer the city picks may do the review. The city must keep a list of at least three such reviewers. A city also may not change or cancel a plan it has already approved while the work is under way, apart from listed exceptions. If the city wants corrections, it must meet the builder within 10 working days and explain them. The Arizona House passed it 44-14, and the Governor signed it into law.
May 7, 2025Supports Housing Affordability
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2447, which turns several optional city practices into required ones. A city must let staff sign off site plans, development plans, land splits, lot line changes and plats without a public hearing. It must let staff approve design plans against written standards. It must allow early grading and drainage work at the builder's own risk. And it must offer faster review to builders with a record of following the rules. The duties start in January 2026. The Arizona House passed it 38-22, and the Governor signed it into law.
February 25, 2025Supports Housing Affordability
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Social Programs and Welfare
Social Programs and Welfare · 6 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1296, which would have tightened what a person must do to keep unemployment benefits. A claimant would have had to take at least five job search actions each week and report them weekly. An existing requirement to search in a systematic way would have been removed. The department would also have cross-checked claims against other data. The Arizona House passed it 32-23, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 14, 2025Opposes Social Programs and Welfare
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1071, which would have added checks to food assistance. The Department of Economic Security would have had to share data with the revenue department to find households with lottery or gambling winnings of $3,000 or more. It would have treated that data as confirmed on arrival. Households above the resource limit would have been referred on. The Arizona House passed it 31-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
March 31, 2025Opposes Social Programs and Welfare
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2165, which would have tried to stop food assistance being spent on soda. The Department of Economic Security would have had to ask the federal government for permission to exclude it, and to keep asking every year until permission was granted. Soda was defined as a fizzy drink with more than one gram of added sugar or any artificial sweetener. The Arizona House passed it 32-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 26, 2025Opposes Social Programs and Welfare
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2122, which would have stopped Arizona easing the work rule attached to food assistance. The state could not have sought, accepted or renewed any waiver of the work requirement for able-bodied adults without dependants unless federal law required it or state law allowed it. It also could not have used the state's own option to exempt anyone. The Arizona House passed it 33-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 25, 2025Opposes Social Programs and Welfare
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2121, which would have made able-bodied adults under 60 join a work and training program to keep food assistance. The Department of Economic Security would have had to require it of everyone in that group who receives the benefit. People meeting the listed exemptions would have been excused. The Arizona House passed it 33-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 25, 2025Opposes Social Programs and Welfare
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2450, which would have tied how long unemployment benefits last to the jobless rate. The schedule started at 12 weeks while unemployment is 5 percent or less. It rose in steps as the rate rose, reaching 24 weeks once unemployment passed 7.5 percent. The rate for the previous quarter would have set the length. The Arizona House passed it 32-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 20, 2025Opposes Social Programs and Welfare
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Public Education Quality
Public Education Quality · 1 support
Voted for House Bill 2375, which would have put a clock on summer requests to assess a child for a disability. Where a parent asked in writing between May 1 and August 15, the home school district would have had to start the evaluation, or refuse in writing, within 15 calendar days. The Arizona House passed it 33-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 17, 2025Supports Public Education Quality
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Gun Control
Gun Control · 4 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1143, which would have blocked records that show who owns firearms. Government bodies could not have kept any list or registry of privately owned firearms or their owners, except during a criminal investigation or where the law requires it. Card payment networks could not have used a separate merchant code to mark out gun retailers. The Arizona House passed it 32-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 5, 2025Opposes Gun Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1014, which would have taken firearm suppressors out of Arizona's list of prohibited weapons. A suppressor is a device fitted to a firearm to muffle the sound of a shot. Removing it from that list would have ended the state offense attached to it. The Arizona House passed it 31-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Opposes Gun Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1020, which would have stopped universities and community colleges banning guns on campus. A governing board could no longer have prohibited someone with a valid permit carrying a concealed weapon. Nor could it have prohibited a firearm being transported or stored, properly secured, in a car or motorcycle. The Arizona House passed it 31-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Opposes Gun Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1705, which would have let a court fine a local official personally for making local gun rules. Arizona reserves firearm regulation to the state. An elected or appointed local official, or an agency head, who knowingly and willfully broke that rule could have been fined up to $5,000. The Arizona House passed it 31-24, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 16, 2025Opposes Gun Control
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Election Integrity
Election Integrity · 10 support · 1 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1001, which would have let counties count early ballots on site during the early voting period, and tightened how a late early ballot is handed in. A voter dropping off their own early ballot after the Friday before election day would have had to show identification and sign an attestation. Someone delivering another person's ballot would have had to show their own identification and sign as well. The Arizona House passed it 31-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
June 24, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1098, which would have required proof of identity to hand in an early ballot. A voter dropping off their own ballot would have had to show identification with a name that matches the envelope. Someone dropping off another person's ballot would have had to show their own. Both would have had to sign a statement. The Arizona House passed it 32-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 5, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1064, which would have set minimum security standards for the machines that record and count votes. The machines would have had to be set up to security standards issued by the federal cybersecurity agency. They could not have carried hardware supporting internet or other remote access, or software able to change results files. The Arizona House passed it 32-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 5, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1280, which would have required counties to send the cast vote record to the Secretary of State within 48 hours of the county count. A cast vote record is the anonymous list of how each ballot was marked. It would have had to go unaltered and in its original order, and would have become a public record. Precincts with under 25 registered voters would have been left out. The Arizona House passed it 33-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 16, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1123, which would have set security rules for the paper ballots are printed on. A supplier would have had to hold one of three named quality or security certifications. The paper would have had to carry at least three anti-fraud features from a set list. Examples include watermarked security paper of controlled supply, or a holographic foil that cannot be copied. The Arizona House passed it 31-21, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 15, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Lisa Fink sponsored HB2060 to assert Arizona authority over voter qualifications in federal elections held in the state; Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed it.
April 15, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: azleg.gov · researched July 12, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2440, which would have barred the Attorney General bringing a criminal or civil case against a county supervisor for voting against certifying an election count. The protection would have applied where the supervisor acted in a good faith belief, or had been shown material suggesting irregularities or errors. Certifying the count is the step that makes a result final. Other election offenses could still have been prosecuted. The Arizona House passed it 33-24, and the Governor vetoed it.
March 5, 2025Opposes Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2154, which would have taken a voter off the list that automatically sends them an early ballot when post came back undelivered. Arizona sends a notice every 90 days to people on that list. If the notice was returned as undeliverable, the county recorder would have had to mark the voter inactive and drop them from the list. The Arizona House passed it 32-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
March 3, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2004, which would have stopped a county recorder sending a voter registration card to an address outside Arizona. The card is the paper that confirms a person is registered. Voters serving in the military or living overseas would have been exempt, as would residents with no United States post office in the state to serve them. The Arizona House passed it 32-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 12, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2006, which would have made anyone outside government who sends out an official-looking election document print the words Not from a Government Agency on the envelope. The wording would have had to be bold and easy to read. The rule would have covered any document that resembles an official election document. The Arizona House passed it 37-19, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 6, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2007, which would have banned paying anyone, or being paid, by the number of voter registration forms collected, filled in or handed in. Payment based on how many forms a person gathers is what the ban would have reached. Paid registration work itself was not otherwise addressed. The Arizona House passed it 34-23, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 6, 2025Supports Election Integrity
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Civil Rights
Civil Rights · 3 support · 12 oppose
The Arizona House passed Lisa Fink's HB2085, which prohibited gender-transition procedures for minors, referrals for those procedures, and use of public funds for providers performing them on minors.
February 24, 2026Opposes Civil Rights
Source: azleg.gov · researched July 12, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1097, which would have opened more buildings as polling places. Public offices, including public schools with a gymnasium, would have had to serve as a polling place when the officer running the election asked. District schools would have had to close on primary and general election days, with staff paid and doing training instead, and unable to take leave on those days. The Arizona House passed it 31-23, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 6, 2025Supports Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1052, which would have taken the vote away from United States citizens who have never lived in the country. Arizona law lets such a citizen cast a federal write-in absentee ballot if a parent is a citizen registered to vote in Arizona. This bill would have removed that provision. The Arizona House passed it 32-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 5, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1586, which would have made a clinician personally liable for the cost of reversing gender transition care given to a minor. The liability would have been strict, so fault would not have had to be shown. It would have lasted 25 years after the original care. A person who later had reversal treatment could have sued until they turned 26. The Arizona House passed it 31-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1003, which would have required a public school to make a separate arrangement for anyone unwilling or unable to share a restroom, changing room or sleeping quarters with someone of another sex. The person would have had to ask in writing. The bill would have created a private right to sue a school that did not comply. The Arizona House passed it 31-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1002, which would have stopped school staff calling a pupil by a name or pronoun that differs from school records without written permission from a parent. The rule would have covered employees and contractors at district and charter schools. It would have applied to any pronoun not matching the pupil's biological sex, and to any first or middle name other than the one on the official record. The Arizona House passed it 31-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
May 1, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1694, which would have cut off all state money to any public university or community college that offers a course on diversity, equity and inclusion. The ban would have applied for the whole financial year in which such a course was offered. The state treasurer, the board of regents and the Department of Administration would all have been barred from paying the institution. The Arizona House passed it 32-23, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 28, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1378, which stops a homeowners association banning a political flag. State law already barred these groups from banning political signs. A flag now counts as one. The rule covers a sign or flag that tries to sway an election, a recall, or the gathering of names for a ballot measure. The Arizona House passed it 32-25, and the Governor signed it into law.
April 17, 2025Supports Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1256, which would have barred state agencies, boards and commissions using diversity, equity and inclusion programs when hiring, training or promoting staff. They could not have required an employee to take part in one, or made taking part a condition of a contract. The Department of Administration would have monitored hiring to enforce it. The Arizona House passed it 33-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 16, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for Senate Bill 1584, which would have required the state and local government to hire on merit and nothing else. They also could not have shaped the make-up of their workforce by race, ethnicity, sex or national origin. The one exception was keeping hiring color-blind under existing anti-discrimination law. The Attorney General, a county attorney or any person could have gone to court to enforce it. The Arizona House passed it 31-21, and the Governor vetoed it.
April 15, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Lisa Fink sponsored HB2062 to define sex-based terms in Arizona law and rules; Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed it.
April 15, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: azleg.gov · researched July 12, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2880, which bans encampments on university and community college campuses. An encampment means a temporary shelter, including a tent, used to stay on campus overnight or for a long period. Administrators must order any group that sets one up to take it down and leave, warn them that staying is criminal trespass, go to court or the police to have them removed, and discipline any student who refuses. Police and campus security may clear an encampment themselves. Anyone who takes part is liable for the cost of repairing damage they caused. The Arizona House passed it 41-17, and the Governor signed it into law.
March 3, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2173, which bars a health licensing board from asking on its application whether the applicant has ever sought mental health help or been diagnosed or treated. The ban covers boards that license doctors, nurses and other health workers. A board may still ask whether the applicant is currently under another state's order to monitor a health condition, including substance use. The applicant need not answer even that if the monitoring is part of a confidential program. The Arizona House passed it 34-25, and the Governor signed it into law.
February 26, 2025Supports Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2062, which would have set one meaning for sex-based words across state law and public policy. Any rule against sex discrimination would also have had to bar unfair treatment of a similar person of the other sex. The state and local government could have kept single-sex spaces. The bill named athletics, living quarters, locker rooms, bathrooms, domestic violence shelters and sexual assault centers. The Arizona House passed it 32-27, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 12, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2017, which would have closed voting centers and cut back early voting sites. A voting center lets any voter in the county vote there rather than at one assigned polling place. County supervisors could no longer have authorized them. The law letting a county recorder set up on-site early voting places would have been repealed, and no precinct could have held more than 1,000 registered voters. The Arizona House passed it 32-26, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 11, 2025Opposes Civil Rights
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Corporate Accountability
Corporate Accountability · 1 support · 1 oppose
Voted for Senate Bill 1514, which would have made arbitration binding for some warehouse workers. A written agreement to arbitrate an employment dispute would have been valid and could not have been revoked, for workers whose main job is loading, unloading or handling goods at a warehouse. Their right to complain to the civil rights division would have remained. The Arizona House passed it 34-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
June 18, 2025Opposes Corporate Accountability
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted for House Bill 2788, which would have made electricity companies show their long-term plan. An electric utility would have had to file a resource plan with the Corporation Commission for review and approval at least every three years. The plan would have had to project demand 15 years ahead under low, medium and high growth, and list every plant it relies on and every one due to retire. The Arizona House passed it 31-28, and the Governor vetoed it.
February 26, 2025Supports Corporate Accountability
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — Public Infrastructure
Public Infrastructure · 1 support
Voted for Senate Bill 1501, which would have required regular checks on the security of the electricity grid. The Corporation Commission would have had to run a grid security review at least every two years. Each investor-owned utility would have had to research and assess technology that can protect the grid or withstand an attack on it. The Arizona House passed it 31-25, and the Governor vetoed it.
March 31, 2025Supports Public Infrastructure
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Track record — General
General · 1 record
Arizona House Speaker-elect Steve Montenegro appointed Lisa Fink vice chair of the House Government Committee for the 2025 legislative session.
November 27, 2024
Source: azleg.gov · researched July 12, 2026
Track record — Other records
Other records · 10 records
As House Government Committee vice chair, Lisa Fink participated in a special committee meeting on Arizona Department of Child Safety bills involving kinship placement, child-neglect standards, and agency legal counsel.
February 19, 2026
Source: azleg.gov · researched July 12, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1537, which sets up a state license for housing that people move into after prison. The state health department must write minimum standards to keep residents and the public safe. Each licensed home must have written rules that help residents settle back into daily life, through treatment, self-help groups or other support. Until now these homes had no license of their own. The Arizona House passed it 31-25, and the Governor signed it into law.
June 26, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1247, which raises the age for buying or having tobacco and vaping products from 18 to 21, matching federal law. Someone aged 18 to 20 who is serving in the armed forces or the National Guard may still have and use them. This bill started out as a measure about the Arizona teachers academy, and the House replaced its entire text with the tobacco rules. The Arizona House passed it 39-13, and the Governor signed it into law.
June 4, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1351, which creates a new crime called gift card theft. A person commits it by taking a gift card or its numbers without the holder's consent, by getting them by exploiting the holder, or by spending a card obtained either way. The crime is a class 4 felony, and forging a gift card now counts as forgery. The law covers physical and digital cards, activated or not. The Arizona House passed it 33-25, and the Governor signed it into law.
May 7, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1307, which tells the state to plan for small electric aircraft. From September 2026 the Department of Transportation must write a statewide plan, or add to the existing aviation plan, covering public landing pads for these aircraft, charging stations and what else the technology needs. It must consult airports, airlines and federal regulators, and name an in-house expert that cities and regions can turn to. The law orders a plan; it does not itself build anything. The Arizona House passed it 44-12, and the Governor signed it into law.
May 1, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1590, which removes the yearly dollar limit on insurance coverage for autism therapy. The old law paid for no more than $50,000 of that therapy a year for a child under 9. For a child aged 9 through 15 the limit was $25,000 a year. The new law drops both limits. It also defines autism by the current psychiatric manual, rather than by a fixed list of three conditions. The Arizona House passed it 43-12, and the Governor signed it into law.
April 30, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1316, which makes Arizona's review of mothers who die permanent. The Maternal Mortality Review Program takes this work over from the child death team. It looks at how often deaths tied to pregnancy happen, what causes them, and which could have been avoided. The program must collect the data, train the agencies that help, run the case reviews, and say whether state law and services need to change. The Arizona House passed it 42-14, and the Governor signed it into law.
April 28, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1333, which pushes the state to place foster children in family homes rather than group settings. The Department of Child Safety must keep enough licensed foster homes that a child can be placed in the one that best suits their needs. When a child is put in a group setting instead, the department must follow set steps and report within 30 days. A group foster home that gives a child medicine must have written procedures for how it does so and how it provides qualified health care around the clock. The Arizona House passed it 44-11, and the Governor signed it into law.
April 9, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against Senate Bill 1159, which raises the size of an unpaid wage claim a worker can bring to the Industrial Commission of Arizona from $5,000 to $12,000. That office can collect unpaid wages for a worker without the worker having to sue. A worker whose claim is larger than the limit still has to go to court. The Arizona House passed it 42-15, and the Governor signed it into law.
March 27, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Voted against House Bill 2110, which changes how much older commercial property a city must open up for housing. The old law let a city stop at 10 percent of its commercial, office, and mixed-use property. The new law makes 10 percent a floor, not a ceiling. It counts the share by parcel instead of by building. A city may no longer pick which parcels qualify, or rule out a parcel that is quiet enough to live on. The Arizona House passed it 42-16, and the Governor signed it into law.
February 20, 2025
Source: legiscan.com · researched September 5, 2026
Race Lisa Fink is in:
- State Representative - District No. 27 · November 3, 2026 · State House District 27; Arizona · incumbent
Past race Lisa Fink ran in:
- Arizona State Representative, District 27 · July 21, 2026 · State House District 27; Arizona · incumbent
Profile last researched August 9, 2026.