Skip to content

Samuel J. Myers

AZ · Judge, Maricopa County Superior Court

Official website

Samuel J. Myers is a Maricopa County Superior Court judge appointed in 2007.

Where Samuel J. Myers stands, based on their records

Supports

Public Safety and Crime Control (6 records), Civil Rights (5 records)

Campaign finance information not available

Track record

Track record — Public Safety and Crime Control

Public Safety and Crime Control · 6 support
  • Sentenced Deleon Haynes to three years of supervised probation, 100 hours of community service and substance-abuse treatment for aggravated assault.

    June 3, 2024Supports Public Safety and Crime Control

    Source: fox10phoenix.com · researched September 13, 2026

  • Served on Arizona's Post-Conviction Actions Task Force.

    August 20, 2019Supports Public Safety and Crime Control

    Source: azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Served on the Arizona Supreme Court's Capital Case Oversight Committee.

    March 13, 2019Supports Public Safety and Crime Control

    Source: azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Served on Arizona's task force reviewing Rule 32 criminal post-conviction procedures.

    February 6, 2019Supports Public Safety and Crime Control

    Source: azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Became presiding judge of the Superior Court's criminal department.

    June 1, 2015Supports Public Safety and Crime Control

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Worked as a Maricopa County deputy county attorney, including in the family-violence and homicide divisions.

    January 1, 1995Supports Public Safety and Crime Control

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov · researched September 13, 2026

Track record — Civil Rights

Civil Rights · 5 support
  • Found that alternate-elector defendants cleared the initial evidentiary threshold for an expedited anti-SLAPP hearing.

    February 1, 2026Supports Civil Rights

    Source: cms.stateaffairs.com · researched September 13, 2026

  • Remanded Arizona's alternate-electors prosecution to a grand jury after finding defendants were denied a substantial procedural right.

    May 30, 2025Supports Civil Rights

    Source: cms.stateaffairs.com · researched September 13, 2026

  • Served on Arizona's Post-Conviction Actions Task Force.

    August 20, 2019Supports Civil Rights

    Source: azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Served on Arizona's task force reviewing Rule 32 criminal post-conviction procedures.

    February 6, 2019Supports Civil Rights

    Source: azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Seconded a proposal for automatic restoration of civil rights for all felony offenders.

    December 7, 2018Supports Civil Rights

    Source: azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

Track record — General

General · 2 records
  • Became associate presiding judge of the Superior Court's civil division.

    April 1, 2010

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Began serving as a Maricopa County Superior Court judge.

    October 1, 2007

    Source: superiorcourt.maricopa.gov · researched September 13, 2026

Track record — Impartiality

Impartiality · 1 favorable
  • Denied a criminal defendant's request to disqualify another judicial officer for alleged bias.

    October 9, 2018Favorable on Impartiality

    Source: law.justia.com · researched September 13, 2026

Track record — Legal Competence

Legal Competence · 4 favorable
  • Was found to meet Arizona judicial performance standards for the 2026 retention cycle.

    April 10, 2026Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Found that alternate-elector defendants cleared the initial evidentiary threshold for an expedited anti-SLAPP hearing.

    February 1, 2026Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: cms.stateaffairs.com · researched September 13, 2026

  • Remanded Arizona's alternate-electors prosecution to a grand jury after finding defendants were denied a substantial procedural right.

    May 30, 2025Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: cms.stateaffairs.com · researched September 13, 2026

  • Was unanimously found to meet Arizona judicial performance standards.

    January 1, 2014Favorable on Legal Competence

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

Track record — Candidate Ethics

Candidate Ethics · 3 records
  • Was found to meet Arizona judicial performance standards for the 2026 retention cycle.

    April 10, 2026

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

  • Remanded Arizona's alternate-electors prosecution to a grand jury after finding defendants were denied a substantial procedural right.

    May 30, 2025

    Source: cms.stateaffairs.com · researched September 13, 2026

  • Was unanimously found to meet Arizona judicial performance standards.

    January 1, 2014

    Source: jpr.azcourts.gov · researched September 13, 2026

Retention question · November 3, 2026

Profile last researched September 13, 2026.